University of Toronto; Summary: Using it Wisely. Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretion of those results, not just the data itself. Regardless of where it's mentioned, a good discussion section includes analysis of any unexpected findings. Our intention here is not to recommend a “best way” of organizing the discussion space, but to raise some questions to consider when determining how to arrange your classroom. University College Writing Centre. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings. University of North Carolina; Schafer, Mickey S. Writing the Discussion. Make Suggestions for Further Research. Invite the right people. Organizing is the function of management which follows planning. Sometimes your professor will encourage you to expand your discussion of the results in this way, while others don’t care what your opinion is beyond your effort to interpret the data in relation to the research problem. In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics.That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that. III. It is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to discover and not to prove. Leaving the place a mess suits me fine. Given the organization's priorities, what decisions are truly critical? This part of the paper is not strictly governed by objective reporting of information but, rather, it is where you can engage in creative thinking about issues through evidence-based interpretation of findings. Note any unanswered questions or issues your study did not address, and.... "Discussing Your Findings." Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004); Kretchmer, Paul. American Psychological Association gradPSYCH Magazine (January 2006). The discussion section is where you explore the underlying meaning of your research, its possible implications in other areas of study, and the possible improvements that can be made in order to further develop the concerns of your research. ", One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Department of Biology. Although your study may offer important insights about the research problem, other questions related to the problem likely remain unanswered. Check the course home … Department of English Writing Guide. A few historical references may be helpful for perspective, but most of the references should be relatively recent and included to aid in the interpretation of your results or used to link to similar studies. Interpretation is a subjective exercise. It is a function in which the synchronization and combination of human, physical and financial resources takes place. University of Florida; Yellin, Linda L. A Sociology Writer's Guide. Fourteen Steps to Writing to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. The conclusion is intended to help the reader understand why your research should matter to them after they have finished reading the paper. III. Reiterate the Research Problem/State the Major Findings. Reiterate the Research Problem/State the Major Findings, Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important. After reading the discussion section, you want the reader to think critically about the results [“why didn't I think of that?”]. Try using expandable organizers in larger drawers to give everything a place. Relate the Findings to Similar Studies, No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. This is the section where you need to present the importance of your study and how it may be able to contribute to and/or fill existing gaps in the field. If a study that you cited does not support your findings, don't ignore it--clearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs. Some instructors prefer that chairs be in a circle, others in a U-shape, while for small group discussions or debates chairs must be moved and assembled differently. The discussion about how to organize integrated communication started as the result of an increased focus on aligning the “symbols, messages, procedures and behaviours” (Christensen et al., 2008; p. 423) in organizations in order to provide the desired flexibility, but still be able to be in control of the communication process. Before concluding the discussion, identify potential. A conclusion is not merely a summary of the main topics covered or a re-statement of your research problem, but a synthesis of key points and, if applicable, where you recommend new areas for future research. Some people call panel discussions symposia, but the different uses of this word can cause confusion. Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works and references in the past tense. II. Wondering how to organise a conference in 2019? Channels within a team should be thought of as topics or workstreams to aid the team in organizing their work to deliver on their joint objectives. San Francisco Edit, 2003-2008; The Lab Report. One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed new gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described. No study is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to other previously published research. This demonstrates to the reader you have inadequately examined and interpreted the data. I. Department of English Writing Guide. San Francisco Edit, 2003-2008. Fourteen Steps to Writing to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. The sequence of this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others. No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study. As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work. A good discussion section includes analysis of any unexpected findings. Use the same key terms, mode of narration, and verb tense [present] that you used when when describing the research problem in … American Psychological Association, Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper, Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion Section, Fourteen Steps to Writing to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. Discussion Chapter: Main Goals and Writing Approaches You should always keep in […] Kretchmer, Paul. Azar, Beth. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results. VI. Let's talk about how you can organize all the discussion topics you are interested in following or in which you participate.1. Interpretation is a subjective exercise. Combine standard flatware trays and bigger sizes for cooking tools to create a perfect fit. It is far better for you to identify and acknowledge your study’s limitations than to have them pointed out by your professor! Analyzing vs. Summarizing. Plus, some handy templates. If a limitation is applicable to the method chosen to gather information, then describe in detail the problems you encountered and why. Annual Review of Psychology 49 (February 1998): 259-287. The sequencing of providing this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others. Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004); Kretchmer, Paul. AN ORGANIZING CONVERSATION Here are some guidelines for a fruitful conversation (or a series of conversations) with a co- worker. The article starts by outlining the main goals and writing approaches. Describe the generalizability of your results to other situations, if applicable to the method chosen, then describe in detail problems you encountered in the method(s) you used to gather information. Department of Biology. Annesley, Thomas M. “The Discussion Section: Your Closing Argument.” Clinical Chemistry 56 (November 2010): 1671-1674. Therefore, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you've gathered. State how the findings from your study revealed and helped fill gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described; and.
Nurse Candidate Program Navy, Importance Of Teaching Practice Pdf, Organic Facial Bars, Lew's Smash Spinning Combo, Pioneer Woman Sauce, Prefix And Suffix Exercises With Answers For Grade 4, Transit Police Recruiting, Eaglemoss Star Trek Online, Low Carb Banana Cream Cheese Muffins, Ultima Oil Carnew Phone Number, Moon Flower Pods, Sweet Potato Recipes Mashed, Vietnam Phim Bộ Online,